Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Joe Sleeper <joe@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] QA or an unchanging portage tree?
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 22:09:46
Message-Id: 1075845784.25425.73.camel@neo.jsleeper.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] QA or an unchanging portage tree? by Kurt Lieber
1 On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 16:19, Kurt Lieber wrote:
2 > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:10:48PM -0500 or thereabouts, Joe Sleeper wrote:
3 > > In my opinion both options, if executed in a manner that makes sense,
4 > > would help make Gentoo a better option for more people to use it in a
5 > > server environment.
6 >
7 > OK, let me clarify the original question.
8 >
9 > Of course both options are important. However, if you had to pick which
10 > one would be implemented *first*, which would you choose and why?
11
12 I guess I did ramble a bit - little further in that email was my vote
13 for #2.
14
15 --
16 joe sleeper
17 freenode nick - jsleeper