1 |
Sancho2k.net Lists wrote: |
2 |
> chroot'ing would in fact, chroot users to a defined directory. It |
3 |
> changes the root to a different directory, so that for example a user |
4 |
> will see / in their chroot and it is actually /home/user/chroot, or |
5 |
> something similar. |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
I understand that chrooting a user will keep them confined... my |
9 |
question was whether chrooting the ssh executable would confine them. If |
10 |
I understood the previous post correctly, it was suggesting that I put |
11 |
sshd in a chroot jail and that this is a separate action from trapping a |
12 |
user in a chroot. Have I gotten this wrong? |
13 |
|
14 |
Chrooting ssh, as with chrooting apache or an ftp server, would have |
15 |
obvious benefits, but I would still have to set up chroot jails for any |
16 |
login users, right? |
17 |
|
18 |
I'm actually liking the webDAV idea at this point... though I'm assuming |
19 |
that's not encrypted. Anyone know for sure? |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
thanks, |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
b |