Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Benjamin Coles <sj7trunks@g.o>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] which ftp-server
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 18:08:57
Message-Id: 1074449312.1048.4.camel@gentoo.pendulus.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] which ftp-server by Ben Munat
1 SFTP is dramatically slow from my experiences...
2
3 -Benjamin
4
5 On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 09:39, Ben Munat wrote:
6 > Well, something (ssh?) installed sftp on both of my boxes... anything
7 > wrong with using that? It's secure and seems to work just fine. What do
8 > pureftp and proftp offer that sftp doesn't?
9 >
10 > b
11 >
12 >
13 > Andrea Ferraris wrote:
14 > >>From: "Benjamin Coles" <sj7trunks@g.o>
15 > >
16 > >
17 > >>I second proftpd... most people like to complain and say ftp is a
18 > >>unsecure protocol because it's not ssl. Well news to the people that
19 > >>don't know, proftpd supports ssl which works wonders on system=)
20 > >
21 > >
22 > > Thx. Good to know.
23 > >
24 > > I don't know wich are the details and I have very litle experience with
25 > > proftpd and none with pure-ftpd, but for curiosity I went to pure-ftpd
26 > > site and I saw:
27 > >
28 > > "Transmission of cleartext passwords and commands can be avoided :
29 > > Pure-FTPd has optional support for an SSL/TLS encryption layer using
30 > > the OpenSSL library. "
31 > >
32 > > I also saw that Pure-FTP doesn't have any records of security vulnerability,
33 > > instead it seems that in the past there was compromised system due to
34 > > proftpd security bugs.
35 > >
36 > > Regards,
37 > > Andrea
38 > >
39 >

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature