1 |
Hi Jeroen, |
2 |
on Saturday, 2006-10-14 at 12:19:59, you wrote: |
3 |
> >2) How high can these numbers be before a system admin should start |
4 |
> >to worry about preformance? |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> Erm... they don't have much to do with performance, they just happen; |
7 |
> if they didn't, you wouldn't have a working system... Just FYI: the |
8 |
> 2.6 kernel uses a 1000Hz timer for the process scheduler, so expect to |
9 |
> see at least 1000 interrupts per second no matter what else your |
10 |
> system is doing. |
11 |
|
12 |
Butting in quite late, but... |
13 |
Remember that conversation we had in April? |
14 |
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.server/3907) |
15 |
I was having terrible performance problems on my SMP box and solved them |
16 |
by recompiling the kernel with 100 Hz ticks. 250 or 1000 Hz are fine if |
17 |
you need low latency at the cost of throughput, like for audio |
18 |
applications (250 even for general single-CPU desktops) but in some |
19 |
configurations they can be deadly. |
20 |
So there's no reason to be overly concerned with interrupts and context |
21 |
switches if you're not having any performance problems but it can be worth |
22 |
looking into if you do. |
23 |
|
24 |
cheers! |
25 |
Matthias |
26 |
-- |
27 |
I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: FAC37665 |
28 |
Fingerprint: 8C16 3F0A A6FC DF0D 19B0 8DEF 48D9 1700 FAC3 7665 |