Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Rob Baxter <burn@××××××.ca>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] For a 1.5TB server running Samba and NFS ONLY, what's the best kernel?
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:57:19
Message-Id: 414EFDD9.3050907@gentoo.ca
In Reply to: [gentoo-server] For a 1.5TB server running Samba and NFS ONLY, what's the best kernel? by David Wuertele
1 I personally use reiserfs and LVM on my home file server. I've found
2 that the 2.6 kernel is much faster when dealing with Samba than the
3 older 2.4 kernel series. The gentoo 2.6 kernel (gentoo-dev-sources) is
4 quite good and includes drivers for everything you listed. I've been
5 running this system for about 5 months now this way and have found no
6 problems so far.
7
8 Hostname: reverb - OS: Linux 2.6.8-gentoo-r3/i686 - CPU: 2 x Intel(R)
9 Pentium(R) 4 (2612.717 MHz) - Processes: 64 - Uptime: 57d 5h 41m - Load
10 Average: 0.73 - Memory Usage: 184.77MB/1011.06MB (18.27%) - Disk Usage:
11 980.00GB/1159.95GB (84.49%)
12
13 About 500GB of the filesystem is composed of 700MB-1.2GB files.
14
15 Rob
16
17 David Wuertele wrote:
18
19 >I'm rebuilding my terabyte file server from scratch. Previously I
20 >used "emerge gs-sources" to get my kernel, but I'm considering using
21 >the performance-tuned "emerge gentoo-sources" this time.
22 >
23 >I want maximum performance and reliability in these areas:
24 >
25 > on-board Via IDE controller
26 > multiple SIIG ATA-133 PCI IDE controllers
27 > 7-drive RAID5 array
28 > 1.5TB Reiserfs partition
29 > Average file size about 50MB, largest files will commonly exceed 2GB
30 > Samba file sharing
31 > NFS file sharing
32 >
33 >All other areas are of little or no consequence.
34 >Any recommendations?
35 >
36 >Thanks,
37 >Dave
38 >
39 >
40 >