| 1 |
lo, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Monday 30 May 2005 19:33, Thilo Bangert wrote: |
| 4 |
> okay, but how does DNSSEC help you establish that? and what is it that |
| 5 |
> you are securing... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
By cryptographically signing zones you can be assured of the integrity of the |
| 8 |
domains. You are basically securing yourself against dns spoofing. Google |
| 9 |
around for more information on the benefits of dnssec. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> i don't know much about DNSSEC, but |
| 13 |
> from my understanding can DNSSEC establish cryptographic authority about |
| 14 |
> a DNS record, iff you can trust the master of the zone. since non of |
| 15 |
> the root servers supports DNSSEC, your zone can still be subject to |
| 16 |
> forgery... |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> or are you running your own root zone? i guess using split-horizon |
| 19 |
> resolvers could be another setup in which this would work... ? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Running our own root zone. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
On a side note courses such as |
| 24 |
(http://secure.interop.com/catalog/sessionDetail.do?SESSION_ID=1087) more |
| 25 |
information about DNSSEC. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
b |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Benjamin Smee (strerror) |
| 30 |
497F 5E98 1FA0 C313 EA0B 08C7 004A 66ED 448B E78C |
Archives