| 1 |
Sancho2k.net Lists wrote: |
| 2 |
> One question - since 2.6 has gone to the "official" stable kernel at |
| 3 |
> kernel.org, how long can users of hardened-sources count on it being a |
| 4 |
> stable, maintained offering from the hardened team? (Before it would be |
| 5 |
> advisable to move to a 2.6 series kernel?) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Our default supported kernels are still 2.4 based and these are still |
| 8 |
maintained. We plan to make 2.6 the default in time for the 2005.0 release and |
| 9 |
will encourage existing users to switch at the same time. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'd expect the answer to your question is yes, hardened-sources-2.4 will still |
| 12 |
be maintained/supported even when 2.6 is default, but for how long I don't |
| 13 |
know..you'd be better off asking the hardened guys, I have no involvement with |
| 14 |
hardened-sources. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Daniel |
Archives