Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Martin Hajduch <martin.hajduch@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-server] portage sync -> partial ?
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:39:01
Message-Id: 40346806.6050006@assyst-intl.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] Re: Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree by stephen white
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4
5 | Performance problems don't always need databases as the answer.
6 |
7 | The current portage hierarchy contains a huge number of little files
8 | with correlated data scattered all over the place.
9
10 by the way; does everybody need the complete portage tree ?
11 my servers will never run X, games, etc ....
12 due to sec updates my portage mirror is syncing every two days
13 but i would be fine just to sync the packages which i have/need
14
15 well, i could actually modify my rsync command but it would be good to
16 have some (minimal) support in portage;
17 for example to have locally stored&updated compressed list of
18 directories and if something is missing (something what IS in portage)
19 then it would fetch it, etc ...
20
21 i'm nor sure about the details -> is it even possible ? ... it's just
22 an idea ...
23
24 the question is, how many users have at least 1/3 of all the packages
25 installed
26 i don't have, even on my home workstation where i do have X and gnome ...
27 i don't know if it is exact, but my /var/tmp/portage shows 709 packages
28
29 regards,
30 martin
31
32 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
33 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
34 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
35
36 iD8DBQFANGgGFCvm4cvhqkwRAnk8AJ4gOxPJwcqvrbf4rUTFJBeoj8vOCQCeKcs9
37 flGLVZNTaTWQmDnAXAl1VPM=
38 =dIKS
39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] portage sync -> partial ? david@×××××××××.com