From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA0D4138359 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3367E0855; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F4D8E0855 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2001:470:4c22:ae86:babe:71:0:1b9] (port=33828 helo=robot) by muon with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jumZY-0004gn-UY for gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:43:57 +0000 From: Benda Xu To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Weekly Report: Big Data Infrastructure and Maven Overlay in Week 6 References: Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:43:52 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Zhang Zongyu's message of "Sun, 12 Jul 2020 23:42:00 +0800") Message-ID: <87wo38nt13.fsf@robot.e.airelinux.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Archives-Salt: 4911660f-0feb-44ac-84ac-d1486ed7af0c X-Archives-Hash: fc4275246ff353e2ec16d5fba8aeb2b2 Zhang Zongyu writes: > There are also other issues: > 1. Netty is implemented by org.glassfish and com.sun, but they ended > up using the same artifactId. They now share the same package name. I > will rename them next week. Are the source codes of the two different from each other? Benda