From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81959138359 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 03:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67831E086E; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 03:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7713CE086E for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 03:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id j18so11832319wmi.3 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 20:20:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oPbVDYiFNGA0D4AMllT0jH5QfyksnhxqpWPYVmyyp40=; b=mf/obEruzxv/pbb1M+iiVArdSijdZGtI3PSPrOVE/8dpCig/48sJg149TMlLcvoaYF d4A0fPdd2ziZOKR6Qu+atH5s60tecfQLiOmorMZoxrTUKS04yHcmKDO7wZlqEy5msN4Z 3fLCD1VTzqRLWaqQx0VLVk9BWbtJX6Dw0H81jdZBv65lpa4SO8iokX1CMz0sX6O1Cyj+ ufgowJ+A8kOav0JTDhh9qf1vYkuESEAGVeHBzu0DBh7dajS1r3hUaGftT17U07i+OVxw /P0cSogbb5mHQCQ1k07R7MT705qO7k8LS+faRd0UszBhVNWe/2lXK3x9+OwaDluD58zx 4ZHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oPbVDYiFNGA0D4AMllT0jH5QfyksnhxqpWPYVmyyp40=; b=RE9AEymTjrHsK1Mo599rIkttnr+yzIRf7mciEVPt9RHseZ1j0X+9Ga0ZRo+Jcku+7W RyTMW0gRPqRSgubfs1CGepWrB4LkZJxf8T9GaF7IwRhc8k5ywixMzkrLZutaitcc6pW2 ilblpJjTdVb5nXu+dHps6gYfeNdyobRRo3qLyqdnyokv1fqwGvKJ2t+xQxOfRPHuxylT ME67WQ19NFNu4ULHCP9o0G00Ps+uqzpaT0/HoWYkMWuo3QwWA8bnRAmsG+JVWgqp6UnI U1vYEFQos/vMVRScGpo3g6Eb05OsdmbvWAaXVUAt/PtRutEQvMCITHlzIghveRHlxPk8 twGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5330Q1d/NWJXQsonwwTs+HteaegxJX9Ti8rwWHEx6sEEp2q7kPUG i/d1S0Ol/Tfe+892M+cDqmB6zqXNg/OBonjOqM8cPISfGiw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpNEvRis21Do0Zz9YRSCimr2U3lNQZjjoPn8MMqDp5AIu6uOkywPR6EGNgeOW6jjIkrkjBT3yAqhJZMtV+bKs= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:cc12:: with SMTP id h18mr17857355wmb.56.1594610429784; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 20:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <04889986-b273-fd5f-5375-02d0ab0f3a99@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <04889986-b273-fd5f-5375-02d0ab0f3a99@gentoo.org> From: Zhang Zongyu Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:20:00 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Weekly Report: Big Data Infrastructure and Maven Overlay in Week 6 To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: fbbdbd3d-7352-4e4c-8b7e-ca769412d56a X-Archives-Hash: 7dc7d854905c7ba986d633da3ebf2a40 Miroslav =C5=A0ulc =E4=BA=8E2020=E5=B9=B47=E6=9C=8812= =E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E6=97=A5 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=8811:59=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC= =9A > > hi Zhongyu, > > thank you for the report! looks like a nice progress to me :-) is there > anything i could help you with? I think we may discuss about how to compare locally compiles jars and binjars, and how to emerge kotlin, scala and lombok source files. > wrt java-virtuals/*, there was a request (from mgorny iirc) to get rid > of java-virtuals/*. imo the logic of java-virtuals should be preserved, > but the virtuals should be placed under dev-java/ and use a naming > template like this: > > virtual =3D dev-java/servlet-api > implementations =3D dev-java/tomcat-servlet-api, > dev-java/glassfish-servlet-api etc. > > also, is java-pkg-simple.eclass ready for the main tree? and if so, did > you consider to go through the review process of the eclass? it might > take some time to get through the process so it might be good to start > the process soon to not be blocked by the process later. Currently, there are few differences between the main tree version and the one in my overlay. Functions to deal with JAVA_RESOURCES and JAVA_TEST_SRC_DIR do not appear in java-pkg-simple now. I am not sure whether I should go through the review now, because there isn't so much progress for java-pkg-simple. So maybe I will not go through the review this week. > i also just pushed your commits to the main java-ebuilder repo. > > thank you for your work and best regards! > > miroslav > > Regards, Zhang Zongyu