From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C1A2158094 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 09:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FE44E08F2; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 09:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B0ABE08F2 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 09:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id s185so6821033pgs.3 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:14:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=saxVhnW+7Xbu4fC9WwINJvNlvV719w3/JWRA+QzQ+rs=; b=gYYHFichTmxLAhan0wpcn9Ka8alluhiB00dPA3fIMh7UOeU0EA3RtKp949XolecABB FaPwzQ14c97MPynsv6N4lE65YYZR1+al/Ui0KqkWExXRGrbgSJUNk9lpOPQzoVdiE5t3 qO5O1F3KOSLECsIKFTAG8a1nqTVKv//UY+PptuOfDQlsoIIjrwWacI1i/uRsxvMu6Mtb EluLOEmJzdaKUcpBdGjqja0tU/yYEw2Rwdtx1vT8D2AHI3PIsCM/dLa6d+hQk6NswAlP lYX2OTU/IS9puobCz2Udjmjv6HHVu1MxRtre+naECFttNpwCcO5/XF2aVBjoFkxL7IL9 WouA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=saxVhnW+7Xbu4fC9WwINJvNlvV719w3/JWRA+QzQ+rs=; b=AIWKT1t3iLdZEpmLFinB0yQK912woHwYESE+H0AoxvcspgykDIloeH1W25p33urLLS D6rE8ZjB7GcQWokiw/lqCLsLmIq68WSfl1EDIImraXeGgCQOahq9zHiy1ioPANmoqk9r UtGB5NBzarQMZeAbqp9BdYefPFTS7gjhEGDkD8yE0xT1RFV4dSr0WhBsTyMm8wd4wOpG h3FLstuz5tNdIJqDYSvobmjxNRzd1jF62dWH3yhbnZ3xxYGuX11RgHrLD+uTzGuTzKkD Y5Cm/mIjTfZqrDGQTXCZb74YSH4li5pCQUpsb4COzWQB8KfLwebzpELe3QCVFA8w5b3U 1dTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8qU6IgFoiXRKwEnTQARWAJVemnSoAzA3UX2/S0O2cUbNp8NvYr cJ5eMECDlD5HHvsOYNQCJWjWus/zJBKJRgIU X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1v+TYs92DrJum5a8UgVs4kKlMd4UwsYQki/4aQ6e8AhD29+PWsvCuEt8JhnbeIXw3sBVrwJPw== X-Received: by 2002:a65:6d1a:0:b0:3fb:2109:7b87 with SMTP id bf26-20020a656d1a000000b003fb21097b87mr25892419pgb.127.1655802878341; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (49.212.183.201.v6.sakura.ne.jp. [2403:3a00:202:1120:49:212:183:201]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 135-20020a62178d000000b0050dc762817esm10744993pfx.88.2022.06.21.02.14.37 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 17:14:47 +0800 From: wuyy To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Week 1 Report for Refining ROCm Packages in Gentoo Message-ID: References: <87o7yniefd.fsf@gentoo.org> <87edziwh13.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87edziwh13.fsf@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 7454a028-54aa-448e-8985-56f4b78d37f9 X-Archives-Hash: 2002918950dfbd35b3afd5813780935b On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 04:35:20PM +0800, Benda Xu wrote: > > Benda Xu writes: > > You are not answering my question. My original comment was only on the > severe issue of hipcc 'isystem'. Although you mentioned "I came to a > new hipvars.pm and a patch to hipcc.pl, disabling poisoning `-isystem` > and correcting many paths", I cannot see any fix pushed into ::gentoo. > Otherwise we won't be bitten by bug 853184. The statement "I came to a new hipvars.pm and a patch to hipcc.pl, disabling poisoning `-isystem`" describes the situation in packaging dev-util/hip-5.1.3 against vanilla llvm/clang on my own development branch, and it is independent of ug 853184 (they may share some similarities, but at that time I didn't realize there can be bug in hip-5.0.2). Bug 853184 is introduced by https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25861. I am sorry for pusin dev-util/hip-5.0.2-r1 without test it's functionality. I'll go back to the 5.0.2 branch and fix up the mess, and setup a CI system to provide solid testings. > > This is a situation you should avoid at all cost in the future. --