1 |
>>> A they should have their own repo, |
2 |
>>> B, they should be in the same branch. |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> They should be in different repositories but in the same branch? That |
5 |
>> ain't gonna work :-) What do you mean by this? |
6 |
|
7 |
That's how I understand you. |
8 |
|
9 |
+----------+ +----------+ |
10 |
| Repo A | | Repo B | |
11 |
| | | | |
12 |
| +-------------------+ | |
13 |
| | The Branch | | |
14 |
| | | | |
15 |
| | file A | | file B | | |
16 |
| | | | | | |
17 |
| +--------|-|--------+ | |
18 |
| | | | |
19 |
+----------+ +----------+ |
20 |
|
21 |
File A is in Repo A but not Repo B. |
22 |
File B is in Repo B but not Repo A. |
23 |
File A and File B are in the Branch. |
24 |
The Branch is in Repo A and Repo B. |
25 |
|
26 |
That is obviously not what you mean but how I understand it. So please |
27 |
tell me, in a bit more detail. |
28 |
|
29 |
> these are mutually exclusive. you are confusing yourself by thinking |
30 |
> both are possible at the same time. |
31 |
|
32 |
You are confusing me :-) |
33 |
|
34 |
-- Jonas |