1 |
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@×××××××.li> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> For various reasons "etc-under-version-control" loses much of the |
4 |
> power and/or ease of use that comes with the underlying vcs. Much of |
5 |
> this being due to the fact that the files being kept in the repository |
6 |
> are totally unrelated. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> The solution to this obviously is to maintain a separate branch for |
9 |
> each package. |
10 |
|
11 |
I have to ask, what's the 'obviousness' here? I don't see why each |
12 |
package should have it's own branch, if they are not related, A they |
13 |
should have their own repo, B, they should be in the same branch. |
14 |
their relation is relative as they are all configs for a system. I'm a |
15 |
big git user so I'm trying to understand conceptually what you're on |
16 |
about. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Caleb Cushing |
20 |
|
21 |
http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com |