| 1 |
hi Zhongyu, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
thank you for the report! looks like a nice progress to me :-) is there |
| 4 |
anything i could help you with? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
wrt java-virtuals/*, there was a request (from mgorny iirc) to get rid |
| 7 |
of java-virtuals/*. imo the logic of java-virtuals should be preserved, |
| 8 |
but the virtuals should be placed under dev-java/ and use a naming |
| 9 |
template like this: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
virtual = dev-java/servlet-api |
| 12 |
implementations = dev-java/tomcat-servlet-api, |
| 13 |
dev-java/glassfish-servlet-api etc. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
also, is java-pkg-simple.eclass ready for the main tree? and if so, did |
| 16 |
you consider to go through the review process of the eclass? it might |
| 17 |
take some time to get through the process so it might be good to start |
| 18 |
the process soon to not be blocked by the process later. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
i also just pushed your commits to the main java-ebuilder repo. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
thank you for your work and best regards! |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
miroslav |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Dne 12. 07. 20 v 17:42 Zhang Zongyu napsal(a): |
| 28 |
> Hello, |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> This week I have made java-ebuilder accept "--binjar-uri" switch, |
| 31 |
> which will help us avoid circular deps. Also, It is helpful if we want |
| 32 |
> to compare the locally compiled jars and Maven Central distributed |
| 33 |
> jars. [1] |
| 34 |
> I have also patched java-pkg-simple to skip compiling source files if |
| 35 |
> USE="binary" is set. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> One big progress is that I have managed to install |
| 38 |
> "org.apache.spark:spark-core_2.12:3.0.0-preview2". [2] |
| 39 |
> Most of the packages are compiled natively, while a few packages are |
| 40 |
> Maven Central distributed binary jars. |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> The reason why I have to install binaries varies. Here are the main reasons: |
| 43 |
> 1. Maven central only distributes binary jars (even those jars are |
| 44 |
> named with a "sources" suffix). I will fix the problem by changing the |
| 45 |
> SRC_URI of a proper source code file next week. |
| 46 |
> 2. The source code files are not written in Java. Some Jars contain |
| 47 |
> Ruby, Scala, Kotlin, or Lombok codes. [3] Maybe we should discuss how |
| 48 |
> to emerge those packages next week. |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
> There are also other issues: |
| 51 |
> 1. Netty is implemented by org.glassfish and com.sun, but they ended |
| 52 |
> up using the same artifactId. They now share the same package name. I |
| 53 |
> will rename them next week. |
| 54 |
> 2. packages of javax.* and jakarta.*: I believe they should be merged |
| 55 |
> into java-virtuals/. |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
> Next week, I will improve the quality of the overlay and submit some |
| 58 |
> up-to-date ebuild files. |
| 59 |
> The most urgent package should be netty-tcnative, because openssl has |
| 60 |
> changed a lot during these years and the current package cannot be |
| 61 |
> compiled now. |
| 62 |
> |
| 63 |
> Regards, |
| 64 |
> Zhang Zongyu |
| 65 |
> |
| 66 |
> [1] java-ebuilder |
| 67 |
> https://github.com/6-6-6/java-ebuilder |
| 68 |
> [2] the overlay |
| 69 |
> https://github.com/6-6-6/spark-overlay |
| 70 |
> [3] an example artifact that contains Kotlin source codes |
| 71 |
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/squareup/okio/okio/2.6.0/okio-2.6.0-sources.jar |
| 72 |
> |
Archives