Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Your part on ideas/issues for Google Summer of Code 2010
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:21:43
Message-Id: 8b4c83ad1003042221j420f5582mbd0d72ab96c51a2a@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] Your part on ideas/issues for Google Summer of Code 2010 by Sebastian Pipping
1 On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 03/04/10 08:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
3 >> There's bumpchecker too:
4 >> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/gentoo-bumpchecker.git;a=summary
5 >
6 > Is there documentation on this besides the code?
7 >
8
9 There's a command help list when you run the tool, but besides that,
10 nothing. Essentially you run a "bumpchecker" tool and that generates a
11 static html page after parsing upstream versions and portage/overlay
12 status.
13
14 > What's the status of this?
15 > - Is it ready to use?
16
17 It's already being used by the gnome and x11 herds. Here are sample
18 (somewhat outdated) pages:
19
20 http://dev.gentoo.org/~leio/gnome/gnome2.28.html
21 http://dev.gentoo.org/~leio/gnome/gnome2.26.html
22 http://dev.gentoo.org/~eva/gnome/gnome-2.28.2.html
23
24 Recently, patches for perl package support floated around, but I'm not
25 sure what happened to them.
26
27 > - if not could it serve as a base?
28 > - What use cases does it handle?
29 >
30
31 Just one: checking the progress of upstream package versions with
32 portage/overlay package versions.
33
34 This is why grumpy was envisioned. Besides having information about
35 upstream/downstream progress, it would have information about bugs,
36 stable/unstable keywords, p.mask, repoman/pcheck runs, test failures,
37 etc.
38
39 --
40 ~Nirbheek Chauhan
41
42 Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-soc] Your part on ideas/issues for Google Summer of Code 2010 Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com>