1 |
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 03/04/10 08:17, Arun Raghavan wrote: |
3 |
>> There's bumpchecker too: |
4 |
>> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/gentoo-bumpchecker.git;a=summary |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Is there documentation on this besides the code? |
7 |
> |
8 |
|
9 |
There's a command help list when you run the tool, but besides that, |
10 |
nothing. Essentially you run a "bumpchecker" tool and that generates a |
11 |
static html page after parsing upstream versions and portage/overlay |
12 |
status. |
13 |
|
14 |
> What's the status of this? |
15 |
> - Is it ready to use? |
16 |
|
17 |
It's already being used by the gnome and x11 herds. Here are sample |
18 |
(somewhat outdated) pages: |
19 |
|
20 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~leio/gnome/gnome2.28.html |
21 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~leio/gnome/gnome2.26.html |
22 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~eva/gnome/gnome-2.28.2.html |
23 |
|
24 |
Recently, patches for perl package support floated around, but I'm not |
25 |
sure what happened to them. |
26 |
|
27 |
> - if not could it serve as a base? |
28 |
> - What use cases does it handle? |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
Just one: checking the progress of upstream package versions with |
32 |
portage/overlay package versions. |
33 |
|
34 |
This is why grumpy was envisioned. Besides having information about |
35 |
upstream/downstream progress, it would have information about bugs, |
36 |
stable/unstable keywords, p.mask, repoman/pcheck runs, test failures, |
37 |
etc. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
41 |
|
42 |
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |