Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC] native-clang: weekly report #2
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 15:21:41
Message-Id: CAOYuCc3twMN_wvcj-jzHqQjrkb5fLJAuGGvSAqAW+jck2Qn-_g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC] native-clang: weekly report #2 by "Anthony G. Basile"
1 2016-06-11 23:13 GMT+08:00 Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o>:
2 > On 6/11/16 11:12 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
3 >> On 6/11/16 11:08 AM, Lei Zhang wrote:
4 >>> 2016-06-11 22:50 GMT+08:00 Benda Xu <heroxbd@×××××.com>:
5 >>>> Hi,
6 >>>>
7 >>>> Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@×××××.com> writes:
8 >>>>
9 >>>>> - send the first set of patches to clang/LLVM, which enables clang to
10 >>>>> build binaries agains musl
11 >>>>
12 >>>> That's interesting. Could you give a reference of your patch?
13 >>>
14 >>> Here: https://github.com/zzlei/musl-clang
15 >>>
16 >>> They are not accepted yet :)
17 >>>
18 >>>
19 >>> Lei
20 >>>
21 >>
22 >> those are approaximately the equivalent of the gcc patches for musl at
23 >>
24 >> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/musl.git/tree/sys-devel/gcc/files/gcc-4.8.3-musl-linker-path.patch
25 >>
26 >>
27 >
28 > also, Lei, do you mind cc-ing gentoo-musl@l.g.o when giving
29 > your gsoc reports and other stuff. for archival reasons. thanks and
30 > keep up the good work.
31
32 No problem :D
33
34
35 Lei