| 1 |
On 04/12/2010 12:33 PM, Mu Qiao wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hello folk- |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> For folk who have submitted applications, please take a second look at |
| 6 |
>> your proposal, specifically the public comments. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Please note you should be subscribed to your proposal also, but verify |
| 9 |
>> it- the mentors/reviewers use the public comments to ask for |
| 10 |
>> clarification/expanding of proposals, or to point out if there was an |
| 11 |
>> issue with the application where the proposal didn't get pasted. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> It's in your interest to answer whatever questions the mentors level, |
| 14 |
>> so please ensure that you're subscribed and that you've addressed any |
| 15 |
>> questions. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Thanks, and good luck! |
| 18 |
>> ~harring |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Thank you for your note. It's really should be a default option that |
| 22 |
> the proposal is subscribed by the submitter. |
| 23 |
> Anyway, I guess most of us have paid much attention so that the |
| 24 |
> comments should not be missed :) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If you think it should be on by default go to: |
| 28 |
http://code.google.com/p/soc/issues/detail?id=748 |
| 29 |
There you can vote for having it on by default. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Regards, |
| 32 |
Petteri |
Archives