1 |
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 02:20 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: |
2 |
> You should study what had been done in the past (distcc, icecream etc) |
3 |
> and figure out what they are lacking and why nobody is using them on a |
4 |
> geographic network. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Then you have the problem of building a ring of trust strong enough. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> And eventually you have to come to term with how compilers behave |
9 |
> differently depending on a number of situations. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Looks a quite good research project but I warn you not to expect quick |
12 |
> or easy results. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> lu |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
(Please excuse in advance my English expression that might not always |
18 |
fit exactly what I mean to say, I'm actively trying to improve it.) |
19 |
|
20 |
I think that, from the previous messages and my few searches on the |
21 |
Internet, such a project can't be achieved yet. This could be |
22 |
interesting to spend three months collecting resources, parsing them, |
23 |
writing a synthesis and hopefully opening new doors to research. However |
24 |
I don't believe this is the goal of the summer of code. From what I |
25 |
understood, this is more about getting involved in an open source |
26 |
project and achieving an end-product or improving an existing one. |
27 |
|
28 |
I will keep tracking this research subject though and learn more about |
29 |
distcc, icecream and similar tools on my spare time. |
30 |
|
31 |
Regards, |
32 |
|
33 |
Antoine Pinsard |