Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC] native-clang: weekly report #2
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 15:17:07
Message-Id: CAOYuCc3opAHxZht-U-Q845StY3+Y=2VKJzW7Dn=OqSFF29imgg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC] native-clang: weekly report #2 by "Anthony G. Basile"
1 2016-06-11 23:12 GMT+08:00 Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o>:
2 > On 6/11/16 11:08 AM, Lei Zhang wrote:
3 >> 2016-06-11 22:50 GMT+08:00 Benda Xu <heroxbd@×××××.com>:
4 >>> Hi,
5 >>>
6 >>> Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@×××××.com> writes:
7 >>>
8 >>>> - send the first set of patches to clang/LLVM, which enables clang to
9 >>>> build binaries agains musl
10 >>>
11 >>> That's interesting. Could you give a reference of your patch?
12 >>
13 >> Here: https://github.com/zzlei/musl-clang
14 >>
15 >> They are not accepted yet :)
16 >>
17 >>
18 >> Lei
19 >>
20 >
21 > those are approaximately the equivalent of the gcc patches for musl at
22 >
23 > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/musl.git/tree/sys-devel/gcc/files/gcc-4.8.3-musl-linker-path.patch
24
25 I heard GCC 6 has official support for musl, but haven't checked it out myself.
26
27
28 Lei

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC] native-clang: weekly report #2 "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>