Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] About improved binary package support
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:44:56
Message-Id: 81bfc67a0903301144x6686c291q2428a1a0866ec5c8@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] About improved binary package support by Philipp Riegger
1 On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Philipp Riegger <lists@××××××××××××.de> wrote:
2 > But this is definitively not the p2p
3 > approach anymore which was described to me before.
4
5
6 I might have to go back and reread... but p2p as a file transfer
7 doesn't make things insecure, torrent itself is pretty secure because
8 of how it hashes, the thing is you have to trust who started the
9 torrent. outside of torrent, like gnutella, we kinda lose security,
10 might as well be ftp.
11 --
12 Caleb Cushing
13
14 http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-soc] About improved binary package support Philipp Riegger <lists@××××××××××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-soc] About improved binary package support Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@×××.de>