Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC] Fortnightly Report: June 17 - June 30: BLAS/LAPACK Runtime Switch
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 07:08:12
Message-Id: 877e93k0tm.fsf@proton.d.airelinux.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC] Fortnightly Report: June 17 - June 30: BLAS/LAPACK Runtime Switch by Mo Zhou
1 Dear Mo,
2
3 Mo Zhou <lumin@××××××.org> writes:
4
5 > Many things happened during the two weeks:
6 >
7 > 1. The custom eselect-{blas,lapack} had been
8 > finalized and merged into main repo.
9 >
10 > 2. New ebuild files for sci-libs/lapack,
11 > sci-libs/blis had been merged into main
12 > repo.
13 >
14 > 3. Updated virtual/{blas,cblas,lapack,laapcke}
15 > had been merged into main repo. Note that
16 > the corresponding commit was reverted due
17 > to a severe regression introduced by some
18 > subsequent commits (that mistake was unrelated
19 > to this project). We'll add these ebuild
20 > files again soon.
21 >
22 > 4. Submitted PR containing ebuild file for
23 > sci-libs/openblas to main repo.
24 >
25 > So far the very core part of this project has
26 > been implemented and merged/submitted to gentoo.
27 > According to the original plan, the remaining
28 > tasks involve writing documentation and testing
29 > reverse dependencies (this may take a long time
30 > as there are many reverse dependencies).
31
32 The progress is impressive. Keep going.
33
34 Yours,
35 Benda