| 1 |
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 16:29 Fri 15 Jul š š , áÌÅËÓÁÎÄÒ âÅÒÓÅÎÅ× wrote: |
| 3 |
>> 2011/7/15 Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>: |
| 4 |
>> > For DEPEND rather than RDEPEND ones, we'll want to make sure they're |
| 5 |
>> > definitely listed in dependencies of the ebuild being used, rather |
| 6 |
>> > than any level. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> The main drawback of hooklib approach is an inability to track what |
| 9 |
>> files have been loaded while exec call(runtime libraries). Most |
| 10 |
>> RDEPENDS are naturally filtered here. Fusefs approach logs all file |
| 11 |
>> system events. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> This is a difficult problem to distinguish RDEPENDS from DEPENDS. If I |
| 14 |
>> look on files accessed I can say if the dependency is runtime, but I |
| 15 |
>> haven't general strategy. I should watch more building logs of various |
| 16 |
>> packages to find a way. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> You might be able to use src_test for this. If a package is accessed in |
| 19 |
> src_test as well as src_configure/src_compile, it's RDEPEND. Clearly |
| 20 |
> this won't work when src_test isn't defined, but it's a start. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
RDEPEND will be tricky to get right, but I like this approach, could |
| 23 |
work for those packages with tests. |
| 24 |
We are going to discuss an approach for this and for the filtering of |
| 25 |
@system, as we need to find a way to get rid of second-hand deps. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> -- |
| 28 |
> Thanks, |
| 29 |
> Donnie |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Donnie Berkholz |
| 32 |
> Admin, Summer of Code |
| 33 |
> Gentoo Linux and X.Org |
| 34 |
> Blog: http://dberkholz.com |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) |
| 42 |
Gentoo Developer |
Archives