1 |
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Tabibel Sami <sami.tabibel@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Hello, |
3 |
> I am 1st year master degree of Cryptology and information security |
4 |
> I have good C, Python and Linux skills, I have also some experience |
5 |
> whith ncurses and onpenGL libraries, and i am interested to work on |
6 |
> "Tags support for Portage" Gentoo project this summer. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I am looking for any comment about the difficulty and the content of |
9 |
> the project, and also about my chances to be accepted if i apply for. |
10 |
> and how to increase them. |
11 |
|
12 |
Implementing tags is fairly easy to do, so it's not really enough work |
13 |
for a SOC project. The main barrier on a simple project like tags is |
14 |
getting your proposal accepted by the community. Typically, an |
15 |
enhancement like this is proposed as a GLEP [1]. Simple proposals like |
16 |
the tags proposal are extremely vulnerable to "bikeshedding" [2], |
17 |
since practically anyone will feel qualified to give their input on |
18 |
the proposal. This means that you will probably receive an |
19 |
overwhelming amount of input from lots of different people with |
20 |
conflicting ideas about how tags should be implemented. |
21 |
|
22 |
Anyway, I think a metadata.xml extension would probably be the best |
23 |
way to implement tags. For example, that's how we implemented USE flag |
24 |
descriptions [3]. |
25 |
|
26 |
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/ |
27 |
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_law_of_triviality |
28 |
[3] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0056.html |