1 |
It's a good idea. This can be even more helpful and usable(however, it sound |
2 |
not such great as 5-sec booting :-) ) |
3 |
|
4 |
2009/3/27 Andrey Kislyuk <weaver@g.o> |
5 |
|
6 |
> I think the current fast boot focus on the various distros is horribly |
7 |
> misplaced. I couldn't care less whether my machines boot in 30 seconds |
8 |
> or 2 minutes. What I _really_ care about is that when I press the |
9 |
> button on my laptop, it wakes up from sleep in 2 seconds or less. |
10 |
> Linux is pretty bad at this. It's generally much worse than Windows, |
11 |
> which is in turn much worse than OS X. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> So, if you really wish to make a difference in an area that others |
14 |
> haven't dealt with as much, try improving wake from sleep or hibernate |
15 |
> performance. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> -ak |
18 |
> |
19 |
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:30, Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@×××××.com> |
20 |
> wrote: |
21 |
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Alexander Chekmarev |
22 |
> > <chekmarev.alex@×××××.com> wrote: |
23 |
> >> I found so many attempts to improve boot time on various linux distros. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > I'd also like to note that we could speed up boot time by symlinking |
26 |
> > /bin/sh to /bin/dash this speeds up boot time, however it means more |
27 |
> > stuff on the tarball, and even more importantly it means fixing init |
28 |
> > scripts, at this time apache and mysql's are not posix compliant and |
29 |
> > won't work. openrc is ready (or mostly thought I saw an error but have |
30 |
> > yet to get a good look at it) to go however. |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > -- |
33 |
> > Caleb Cushing |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |