| 1 |
On 07/05/2012 02:43 PM, heroxbd@×××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dear Luca, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> writes: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> Sounds good. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Probably during this week before the midterm evaluation I'd like to |
| 9 |
>> spend few days to wrap up what had been done |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> OpenRC on Prefix done, but wait for WilliamH to integrate back to |
| 12 |
> upstream, and then prefix can support it officially. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That's good =) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Evaluation of other init systems (smf, launchd, upstart and systemd is |
| 17 |
> done by mgorny. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
You'll need to learn and teach us as well =) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
>> and see if there are changes to our end of project plans since lots |
| 22 |
>> happened during this time =) |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> The new plan is that I'd like to work with rleigh from debian to |
| 25 |
> package openrc in debian and make it as an alternative init system. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
That part is quite important, as is getting to compile LSB scripts to |
| 28 |
openrc ones (and/or vice-versa) and possibly get openrc support /run/ |
| 29 |
directories |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> What we've discussed in the beginning, such as event-driven init, |
| 32 |
> periodical events, process monitoring and crash restart are still on the |
| 33 |
> todo list. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
That's great, do you feel confident you'll be able to get all of this done? |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
lu |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Luca Barbato |
| 42 |
Gentoo/linux |
| 43 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
Archives