1 |
I have been running gentoo on a sparc64 since 2004.0 or 2005.0 release. |
2 |
I know it isn't sparc32, but unless you have some dire need to run a |
3 |
2.4 kernel I would suggest running a 2.6 kernel. Beside that its |
4 |
getting increasingly difficult to install gentoo under a 2.4 profile. |
5 |
|
6 |
I think we all sometimes forget gentoo is a progressive linux and is |
7 |
always changing. Because of this it is only backward compatible to a |
8 |
short period of time in the past, like a year. Unlike the other |
9 |
distributions (red hat/SuSe, etc) where you can install older versions |
10 |
this distribution sorta requires you to stay somewhat current with the |
11 |
times. =) |
12 |
|
13 |
Not saying it is impossible. For instance I run a few machines in 2.4 |
14 |
profile because I use them for an OpenMosix cluster. That has been |
15 |
removed from portage for months now, but I can still install it because |
16 |
I copied the 2006.0 profile and all the required files to a portage |
17 |
overlay directory so I could still use it even when gentoo stopped |
18 |
supporting it. You may have to do this same technique in order to use |
19 |
your 2.4 kernel and stuff, and as the another poster has mentioned, 2.4 |
20 |
kernel isn't really supported by gentoo anymore in favor of the 2.6 |
21 |
kernel, which I must add works just fine on sparc64 |
22 |
|
23 |
brant williams wrote: |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Which version of linux-headers are you running? Can you do an `emerge - |
26 |
> -pv linux-headers` and show the output? |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I have no experience with SPARC32, but 2.4 is a fine kernel, and not |
29 |
> wholly different (from a user/administrator perspective) than 2.6. You |
30 |
> have to use devfs instead of udev. .:shrug:. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> I know a little about running (Hardened) Gentoo Linux 2.4/2.6 on |
33 |
> SPARC64, although I imagine it's not drastically different for the |
34 |
> SPARCStation 5. So let's start with your kernel-headers version and go |
35 |
> from there. Also, if you could post /usr/src/linux/.config and (if |
36 |
> possible) any dmesg output, that'd be great. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> brant williams |
41 |
> FCAA CDCA 20BC 3925 D634 F5C4 7420 6784 4DEB 6002 |
42 |
> |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Aggelos wrote: |
46 |
> |
47 |
>> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:46:21 +0300 |
48 |
>> From: Aggelos <marmango@××××××××.gr> |
49 |
>> Reply-To: gentoo-sparc@l.g.o |
50 |
>> To: gentoo-sparc@l.g.o |
51 |
>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-sparc] emerging of silo fails |
52 |
> |
53 |
>> on 09/17/2007 03:02 PM Andrew Gaffney wrote the following: |
54 |
>>> Aggelos wrote: |
55 |
>>>> poseidon ~ # ls -l /etc/make.profile lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 62 Sep 12 |
56 |
>>>> 15:02 /etc/make.profile -> |
57 |
>>>> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/sparc/sparc32/2006.1/2.4 |
58 |
>>> |
59 |
>>> First, sparc32 isn't supported, so when it breaks, you won't get much |
60 |
>>> help. Second, the 2.4 kernel is mostly unsupported by Gentoo (not just |
61 |
>>> on sparc), so you're not going to find a lot of help there, either. |
62 |
> |
63 |
>> What kernel can boot a sparcstation 5, besides 2.4 (and lower)? |
64 |
>> Isn't the size of 2.6 prohibitive? |
65 |
> |
66 |
>> -- |
67 |
>> gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |
68 |
> |
69 |
> |
70 |
-- |
71 |
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |