1 |
On 2016-09-09 00:17, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> I suggest dumping all the variables set by |
3 |
> multilib_env() in the place patch changes the eclass, and seeing which |
4 |
> one is different. |
5 |
|
6 |
I just did a quick test as suggested, quite a bit of these vars are now |
7 |
undefined which points the problem. Easy fix, but i wanted to note that |
8 |
most of the profile code for this was pulled right from the official |
9 |
sparc32 profile base. I highly suspect glibc on those profiles will |
10 |
break now, granted there is a lot of outdated / broken things in those |
11 |
profiles. As far as i know, i am the only person working on updated |
12 |
sparc32 profiles let alone sparc64 support. |
13 |
|
14 |
I'm more or less just documenting this for myself at the moment, in case |
15 |
anyone were to ask about it later on the sparc list. At some point i |
16 |
will have to look at getting my work pushed upstream, but i wouldn't say |
17 |
i'm at that point yet. |
18 |
|
19 |
I'll spin up an install using the old profiles and see if i can verify |
20 |
this, and open a bug report against sparc if i can verify it. |