1 |
Jason Wever wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Paul Heinlein wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Jason Wever wrote: |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>> If you're only using 2.4, you can keep using modutils. However if |
10 |
>>> you use 2.6, or want to flip back and forth from 2.4 to 2.6, you can |
11 |
>>> use module-init-tools (as long as the "no-old-linux" use flag is |
12 |
>>> *NOT* enabled (aren't double negatives fun :-P)) |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> Is there any estimate as to when 2.6 will be marked stable for sparc64? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Well, the problem we run into here is typically the quality of the 2.6 |
19 |
> kernels isn't that great on sparc64 (though a lot better than sparc32). |
20 |
> We've been hesitant to mark any of them stable because while some may |
21 |
> work fine on some machines, they don't on others (i.e. 2.6.6 runs fine |
22 |
> on a Blade 100 but locks up consistently on an Ultra 2). |
23 |
|
24 |
Maybe you're Ultra 2 just doesn't like you :) My U2 has been using kernel 2.6.6 |
25 |
for atleast a month since I did the initial install and I haven't had a problem. |
26 |
Currently, its uptime is 11 days (since the last time the power went out here). |
27 |
Although, it isn't doing much. The U2 is only acting as the router for my cable |
28 |
internet connection. |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Andrew Gaffney |
32 |
Network Administrator |
33 |
Skyline Aeronautics, LLC. |
34 |
636-357-1548 |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |