Gentoo Archives: gentoo-sparc

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: Zhang Weiwu <zhangweiwu@××××××.com>
Cc: Leif Sawyer <lsawyer@×××.com>, gentoo-sparc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-sparc] what ultrasparc compare likely such Pentium bo x on desktop performance
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:44:58
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.61.0412021240560.16583@lacewing.inforead.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-sparc] what ultrasparc compare likely such Pentium bo x on desktop performance by Zhang Weiwu
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
5
6 > Leif Sawyer wrote:
7 >
8 >> Oh, I guess I should state that sloccount isn't marked for ~sparc, but
9 >> compiles and works perfectly. Dunno if somebody wants to tag it. :-)
10 >>
11 >>
12 > Yes I noticed it. Becuase sloccount is an purely console tool written in
13 > standard language, I don't expect any trouble if I run it on sparc, so I
14 > guess this is simple a mistake, or the ebuild maker doesn't test it anyway.
15 > Currently I don't know how to tag or report this bug. I'll read a bit the
16 > gentoo handbook to learn to contact those who is responsible.
17 >
18
19 Normally, in a situation like this, just create a bug to the effect that
20
21 XXX works for me on {whatever it works for you on}, please add ~sparc
22 keyword.
23 And assign it to sparc@g.o
24
25 In this case, I'll look at it for you without a bug, however.
26
27 > --
28 > gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list
29 >
30 >
31
32 - --
33 Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
34 Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc)
35 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
37
38 iD8DBQFBrw5CQa6M3+I///cRAnBSAKCBvehZEJxfZj9q+c/tjr1zw4/upwCgsue3
39 dPpVCUrn1p7Ag+YgIgaipzM=
40 =Cvbc
41 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
42
43 --
44 gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list