| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Nick Smith wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> from everything ive read it doesnt look like LVM has any redundancy, i |
| 7 |
> mean it is nice to be able to hotadd drives to your LV, but i need |
| 8 |
> redundancy as well, so it looks like raid1 or 5 would be the way to |
| 9 |
> go, because the backups would get more intensive as the LV grew right? |
| 10 |
> what if one drive in your LV dies? do you lose everything on the LV? |
| 11 |
> sorry for my ignorance, but this LVM is all new to me, and im not |
| 12 |
> finding any clear answers googling on the net... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Well RAID and LVM are two completely different things, i don't know why |
| 15 |
you people mix them up. |
| 16 |
The best of both worlds is RAID1 or RAID5 + LVM. |
| 17 |
RAID0 is basically the same that LVM does and is just concatenation - no |
| 18 |
redundancy at all "a big bunch of disks". |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- -- |
| 21 |
Gustavo Zacarias |
| 22 |
Gentoo/SPARC monkey |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iD8DBQFD+2MBV3G/IBCn/JARAqWfAJ950ZB2Q2EgkVI+q7Z81fDKBqtiOwCfR1QH |
| 28 |
u/RK6aywiCbthI+f1+5y7ig= |
| 29 |
=MhPZ |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |
Archives