Gentoo Archives: gentoo-systemd

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: systemd <systemd@g.o>, gentoo-systemd <gentoo-systemd@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-systemd] How to handle systemd stable branch?
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 21:58:18
Message-Id: 1393797486.7911.1.camel@belkin5
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-systemd] How to handle systemd stable branch? by "Michał Górny"
1 El dom, 02-03-2014 a las 16:04 +0100, Michał Górny escribió:
2 > Dnia 2014-02-28, o godz. 23:21:33
3 > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> napisał(a):
4 >
5 > > Hello
6 > >
7 > > I didn't notice the presence of:
8 > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/
9 > >
10 > > Until now, looks like it's "official" per:
11 > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Backports/
12 > >
13 > > How should we "package" it? cgit provides tarballs at:
14 > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/commit/?id=255eb046a7bcb90e60a3a54302bc1250c1aed26a
15 > >
16 > > For example:
17 > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/snapshot/systemd-stable-255eb046a7bcb90e60a3a54302bc1250c1aed26a.tar.gz
18 > >
19 > > How would you like to prepare that tarballs? How often?
20 >
21 > One more question: how do we want to name the versions? 210_pNN for NN
22 > patches? Or 210.NN?
23 >
24
25 On gnome we call them as _pre$(date)... but would be difficult here as
26 it would be something like 209_pre... :/
27
28 Maybe 208_p1 would be better, or 208_p20140302