| 1 |
> "And regarding the copyright assignment, are you happy with your current |
| 2 |
> policy of only having some parties sign or are you looking for us to |
| 3 |
> make suggestions e.g. re: a clickwrap assignment or something along |
| 4 |
> those lines?" |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> What is the general consensus on this one? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
The question seems to imply that it's fine as it is... |
| 9 |
Does [Redacted] understand the implications of handling GPL enforcement |
| 10 |
(as we interpret it)? Perhaps there is something we're missing? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Are we sure that we want to go the 501(c)(6) route, or would we like |
| 13 |
> [Redacted] to give us more information on some other NFP statuses? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Somewhere in one of Daniel's posts/threads is a set of reasons |
| 16 |
for c6. Off the top of my head the two big points are: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
1. No donation limits (c3 has a limit, but is tax deductable) |
| 19 |
2. Restrictable/Enforcable membership rules (c3 cannot) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
A sub-entity for c3 might be of use. Commentary on that, [Redacted] |
| 22 |
opinions on the directions we could look into, or a link to a |
| 23 |
plain English explanation of the options would be nice. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
--NJ |
Archives