| 1 |
>> Again, this has been resolved in a thread weeks ago, so I |
| 2 |
>> don't see why it needs to be rehashed. The threat of |
| 3 |
>> punishment of our actions by changing your end of the deal is |
| 4 |
>> very unprofessional in my opinion. Is this going to extend |
| 5 |
>> to every trustees decision? If that possibility exists, |
| 6 |
>> maybe we need to take a closer look at the "agreed-upon plan". |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Did you interpret my email as a threat? Maybe you should re-read it? You |
| 9 |
> should really not interpret my email that way. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I just forwarded some emails to the -trustees list. Give them a read. Then |
| 12 |
> read my emails again. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I don't think that it is a problem to consider reasonable requests from you to |
| 16 |
change parts of the agreement. I think this discussion went far in the wrong |
| 17 |
direction, part of it being initiated by us having forgotten what the main |
| 18 |
reason for c6 was. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Paul |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 24 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 25 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 26 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
Archives