| 1 |
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 22:20, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 2 |
> Deedra Waters wrote: [Tue Apr 12 2005, 02:57:27PM CDT] |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > hrm, I'm probably going to upset daniel with this one, but this isn't my |
| 5 |
> > intention... |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > I don't think that he should have perminant use of drobbins@g.o, |
| 8 |
> > I can see it while he's still using the store, but once the use of the |
| 9 |
> > store is done with, there's no reason for him to keep it. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I think there may be two different aspects of this issue. One is |
| 12 |
> drobbins using the drobbins@g.o address for new e-mails, which |
| 13 |
> implicitly suggests that he is representing Gentoo. Given that we |
| 14 |
> control www.g.o, the forums, and the mailing lists, I personally believe |
| 15 |
> that we should be able to counter any confusion that might arise, but I |
| 16 |
> understand that some will disagree with me on principle. The other |
| 17 |
> issue is Daniel receiving mail that goes to drobbins@g.o. That |
| 18 |
> e-mail address is plastered all over the internet (especially in his |
| 19 |
> Intel and IBM articles, not just associated with Gentoo proper), so I |
| 20 |
> can certainly understand drobbins' desire to receive mail at that |
| 21 |
> address. Is there a reasonable compromise that may be reached (assuming |
| 22 |
> that one is needed)? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
What about an abuse termination clause, that states that if he uses the |
| 25 |
address to act as a gentoo developer/against the interests of the foundation |
| 26 |
while in fact not being a member (he might rejoin) his right to use the email |
| 27 |
address is lost (possibly after X warnings) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Paul |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 33 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 34 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 35 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives