| 1 |
Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> It shouldn't do. It's a common enough model, one used by many |
| 4 |
> professional and trade organisations. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Sure. But we're doing this with volunteers, some of which we can't seem |
| 8 |
to get to speak up as it is, I'd hate to imagine the added task of |
| 9 |
tracking varying membership levels.. :P |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Buying a membership has a different slant to it. Companies do it all |
| 12 |
> the time. It'd be even better if we could offer some form of |
| 13 |
> subscription, but right now I can't think of what we could offer in that |
| 14 |
> way. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It could remain an option for the future. But as Grant already pointed |
| 18 |
out, it was in the first proposed set of bylaws and was highly criticized. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> I must have missed that. I would have sworn that this thread was about |
| 21 |
> who could apply for membership, rather than where to go and what to fill |
| 22 |
> out :P |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Sorry, figuring out who could apply for membership is a prerequisite to |
| 26 |
opening up for membership applications. :) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Cheers, |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-C |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Corey Shields |
| 34 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team |
| 35 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
| 36 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
Archives