1 |
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 14:51 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
2 |
> Deedra Waters wrote: [Sat Nov 05 2005, 12:22:10PM CST] |
3 |
> > The next step i believe is to present it to the devs. Does anyone have |
4 |
> > any problems with my going ahead with this to keep things moving? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I'm certainly all for pushing it out to our devs. |
7 |
|
8 |
I agree, we've all said all we have to say. Now it has to be up to the |
9 |
community to accept, reject or modify it. I believe we have come up with |
10 |
the best solution we can, the only thing that is going to be difficult |
11 |
is convincing the community of the need for it (that and the fact that |
12 |
the document lacks any sinister nature). |
13 |
|
14 |
Is there any way that we can get it posted to -core coming from the |
15 |
trustees@ address...I think it would be far better if it was clear that |
16 |
the document was coming from the trustees as a whole and not just one |
17 |
individual. |
18 |
|
19 |
--Dan |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |