| 1 |
(I see no problems with this..) my $0.02 |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
>Hi Deedra, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>That would be fine. I just want "drobbins@g.o" to get to me; I |
| 8 |
>don't need Gentoo to provide me with a mail account, just a permanent |
| 9 |
>alias. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>Regards, |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>Daniel |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>On Apr 12, 2005 3:17 PM, Deedra Waters <dmwaters@g.o> wrote: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>>What if we just have an alias that forwards the mail so he does get the |
| 19 |
>>mail, but it's his responsibility to filter the mail through gmail, or |
| 20 |
>>what ever he uses on his end, along with what Paul suggested. My main |
| 21 |
>>thing here is that a while back he was using dev.g.o for specificly |
| 22 |
>>"managing his mail" or something to that effect. infra disabled his |
| 23 |
>>account, and that caused a lot of problems. Paul brings up a vallid |
| 24 |
>>point with the articles etc etc. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>>On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>>>Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:29:50 +0200 |
| 31 |
>>>From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
| 32 |
>>>Reply-To: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o |
| 33 |
>>>To: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o |
| 34 |
>>>Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright transfer agreement |
| 35 |
>>> |
| 36 |
>>>On Tuesday 12 April 2005 22:20, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 37 |
>>> |
| 38 |
>>> |
| 39 |
>>>>Deedra Waters wrote: [Tue Apr 12 2005, 02:57:27PM CDT] |
| 40 |
>>>> |
| 41 |
>>>> |
| 42 |
>>>> |
| 43 |
>>>>>hrm, I'm probably going to upset daniel with this one, but this isn't my |
| 44 |
>>>>>intention... |
| 45 |
>>>>> |
| 46 |
>>>>>I don't think that he should have perminant use of drobbins@g.o, |
| 47 |
>>>>>I can see it while he's still using the store, but once the use of the |
| 48 |
>>>>>store is done with, there's no reason for him to keep it. |
| 49 |
>>>>> |
| 50 |
>>>>> |
| 51 |
>>>>I think there may be two different aspects of this issue. One is |
| 52 |
>>>>drobbins using the drobbins@g.o address for new e-mails, which |
| 53 |
>>>>implicitly suggests that he is representing Gentoo. Given that we |
| 54 |
>>>>control www.g.o, the forums, and the mailing lists, I personally believe |
| 55 |
>>>>that we should be able to counter any confusion that might arise, but I |
| 56 |
>>>>understand that some will disagree with me on principle. The other |
| 57 |
>>>>issue is Daniel receiving mail that goes to drobbins@g.o. That |
| 58 |
>>>>e-mail address is plastered all over the internet (especially in his |
| 59 |
>>>>Intel and IBM articles, not just associated with Gentoo proper), so I |
| 60 |
>>>>can certainly understand drobbins' desire to receive mail at that |
| 61 |
>>>>address. Is there a reasonable compromise that may be reached (assuming |
| 62 |
>>>>that one is needed)? |
| 63 |
>>>> |
| 64 |
>>>> |
| 65 |
>>>What about an abuse termination clause, that states that if he uses the |
| 66 |
>>>address to act as a gentoo developer/against the interests of the foundation |
| 67 |
>>>while in fact not being a member (he might rejoin) his right to use the email |
| 68 |
>>>address is lost (possibly after X warnings) |
| 69 |
>>> |
| 70 |
>>>Paul |
| 71 |
>>> |
| 72 |
>>> |
| 73 |
>>> |
| 74 |
>>> |
| 75 |
>>-- |
| 76 |
>>Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - |
| 77 |
>>dmwaters@g.o |
| 78 |
>>Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org |
| 79 |
>> |
| 80 |
>>-- |
| 81 |
>>gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
| 82 |
>> |
| 83 |
>> |
| 84 |
>> |
| 85 |
>> |
| 86 |
>-- |
| 87 |
>gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
| 88 |
> |
| 89 |
> |
| 90 |
> |
| 91 |
> |
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
-- |
| 95 |
Corey Shields |
| 96 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team |
| 97 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
| 98 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
| 99 |
|
| 100 |
-- |
| 101 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
Archives