| 1 |
Am 11.05.2010 19:28, schrieb Simon Braunstein: |
| 2 |
> Hallo Hanga Szabo-Mathe, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I will be out of the office starting 2010.05.10 and will not return until |
| 5 |
>> 2010.05.14. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> ___________________________________________________________________________ |
| 8 |
>> ______________________________ Please be advised that the information |
| 9 |
>> contained herein is confidential and intended only for use by the |
| 10 |
>> individual stated above. |
| 11 |
>> If you are not the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any |
| 12 |
>> disclosure, distribution, dissemination, or copying is prohibited. |
| 13 |
>> If this information has been directed to you in error, please contact the |
| 14 |
>> sender immediately at the telephone number listed above. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Wie lautet denn bitte deine Telefonnummer? ... |
| 19 |
> Vergiss es, ich hoffe du schämst dich wenigstens für diese Widerlichkeit in |
| 20 |
> Textform. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
SCNR.. |
| 23 |
Vielleicht sollte man besser DIESEN Disclaimer nehmen; ;-) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
This email is not and cannot, by its |
| 26 |
nature, be confidential. En route from me to you, it will pass across |
| 27 |
the public Internet, easily readable by any number of system |
| 28 |
administrators along the way. If you have received this message by |
| 29 |
mistake, it would be ridiculous for me to tell you not to read it or |
| 30 |
copy to anyone else, because, let's face it, if it's a message |
| 31 |
revealing confidential information or that could embarrass me |
| 32 |
intensely, that's precisely what you'll do. Who wouldn't? Likewise, it |
| 33 |
is superfluous for me to claim copyright in the contents, because I |
| 34 |
own that anyway, even if you print out a hard copy or disseminate this |
| 35 |
message all over the known universe. I don't know why so many |
| 36 |
corporate mail servers feel impelled to attach a disclaimer to the |
| 37 |
bottom of every email message saying otherwise. If you don't know |
| 38 |
either, why not email your corporate lawyers and system administrators |
| 39 |
and ask them why they insist on contributing so much to the waste of |
| 40 |
bandwidth? To say nothing of making the presence of your mail on |
| 41 |
public discussions or mailinglists of explicitly contratictory nature. |
| 42 |
May as well just delete it, eh? Oh, and this message is probably |
| 43 |
plagued with viruses as well. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Christian |
Archives