Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user-de

From: Randy Andy <gugelhuepf@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user-de@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user-de] Merkwürdigkeiten bei File-Access-Time
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:22:48
Message-Id: f73e07350902250522h43644525i449bc6fb00abf8f3@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user-de] Merkwürdigkeiten bei File-Access-Time by Roland Damm
1 Hi Roland,
2
3 vielleicht ist das ja eine Fährte die du mal aufnehmen solltest:
4 Es gab ja kürzlich ein update der Coreutils, vielleicht liegt es an der
5 zuständigen conf. Datei die du eventuell nicht ersetzt hast.
6 Hier ein Auszug aus den Parametern des manuals der Coreutils zu diversen
7 Konfigurationsmöglichkeiten:
8
9
10 10.1.3 Sorting the output
11
12 -------------------------
13
14 These options change the order in which `ls' sorts the information it
15
16 outputs. By default, sorting is done by character code (e.g., ASCII
17
18 order).
19
20 `-c'
21
22 `--time=ctime'
23
24 `--time=status'
25
26 If the long listing format (e.g., `-l', `-o') is being used, print
27
28 the status change time (the `ctime' in the inode) instead of the
29
30 modification time. When explicitly sorting by time (`--sort=time'
31
32 or `-t') or when not using a long listing format, sort according
33
34 to the status change time.
35
36 `-f'
37
38 Primarily, like `-U'--do not sort; list the files in whatever
39
40 order they are stored in the directory. But also enable `-a' (list
41
42 all files) and disable `-l', `--color', and `-s' (if they were
43
44 specified before the `-f').
45
46 `-r'
47
48 `--reverse'
49
50 Reverse whatever the sorting method is--e.g., list files in reverse
51
52 alphabetical order, youngest first, smallest first, or whatever.
53
54 `-S'
55
56 `--sort=size'
57
58 Sort by file size, largest first.
59
60 `-t'
61
62 `--sort=time'
63
64 Sort by modification time (the `mtime' in the inode), newest first.
65
66 `-u'
67
68 `--time=atime'
69
70 `--time=access'
71
72 `--time=use'
73
74 If the long listing format (e.g., `--format=long') is being used,
75
76 print the last access time (the `atime' in the inode). When
77
78 explicitly sorting by time (`--sort=time' or `-t') or when not
79
80 using a long listing format, sort according to the access time.
81
82 `-U'
83
84 `--sort=none'
85
86 Do not sort; list the files in whatever order they are stored in
87
88 the directory. (Do not do any of the other unrelated things that
89
90 `-f' does.) This is especially useful when listing very large
91
92 directories, since not doing any sorting can be noticeably faster.
93
94 `-v'
95
96 `--sort=version'
97
98 Sort by version name and number, lowest first. It behaves like a
99
100 default sort, except that each sequence of decimal digits is
101
102 treated numerically as an index/version number. (*Note More
103
104 details about version sort::.)
105
106 `-X'
107
108 `--sort=extension'
109
110 Sort directory contents alphabetically by file extension
111
112 (characters after the last `.'); files with no extension are
113
114 sorted first.
115
116
117
118
119 2009/2/24 Roland Damm <roland-damm@×××××.de>
120
121 > On Sunday 22 February 2009 22:50:21 Roland Damm wrote:
122 > > Moin,
123 > >
124 > > ich hatte folgendes schon mal in d.c.o.u.l.m. gepostet, aber da kommt
125 > > irgendwie kein Hinweis. Hat hier schon mal jemand folgendes erlebt:
126 > > ....
127 >
128 > Hmm, hier scheint auch keiner das Phänomen zu kennen. Gibt es wenigstens
129 > irgendwelche Tips, in welche Richtung man suchen muss? Speicher KDE
130 > irgendwo
131 > irgendwelche Informationen über Dateien, die nicht im filesystem selbst
132 > abgelegt sind? Zusatzinformationen, die irgendwie korrumpiert sein können,
133 > die man einfach so löschen kann?
134 >
135 > CU Rollo
136 >
137 >
138 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user-de] Merkwürdigkeiten bei File-Access-Time Roland Damm <roland-damm@×××××.de>