| 1 |
* On 07.03.2006 martin lutsch wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> >>> Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package |
| 4 |
> name to an ebuild. |
| 5 |
> !!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/libintl-0) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> jemand ne idee? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Aus den aktuellen GWN [1]: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
----------8<-----[SNIP]-----8<---------- |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Common Portage error message |
| 14 |
---------------------------- |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
For those users who encounter a Portage error similar to the following: |
| 17 |
"!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an ebuild." during an |
| 18 |
'emerge --sync' or an 'emerge --metadata' please do not file a bug about |
| 19 |
it. The code may instruct you to do so, however the developers have |
| 20 |
already found a fix and it is already on bugzilla, re-emerging Portage or |
| 21 |
metadata will suffice. Bug reports filed for this bug will only be marked |
| 22 |
as duplicates of bug 114798[1]. Please see that bug report as well as the |
| 23 |
Portage project's documentation page[2] for details and a fix for this |
| 24 |
issue. Thanks in advance from the Portage Team. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
1. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114798 |
| 27 |
2. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/common-problems.xml |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
---------->8-----[SNAP]----->8---------- |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
1. <http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060306-newsletter.xml> |
Archives