From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 878B6158083 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 22:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EA992BC018; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 22:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-out-auth1.hosts.co.uk (mail-out-auth1.hosts.co.uk [195.7.255.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 015DBE2A09 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 22:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host81-136-75-24.range81-136.btcentralplus.com ([81.136.75.24] helo=[192.168.1.99]) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1sn3fe-000000001EB-58u7 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 23:12:42 +0100 Message-ID: <00018d86-ec80-433b-94d2-994b6fba43e1@youngman.org.uk> Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 23:12:41 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Package compile failures with "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault". To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <8c26be16-d033-ea3f-06e1-a9ce84cbbafb@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-GB From: Wols Lists In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 48bcf920-3f8d-4ef9-bc05-f9232f5f26dd X-Archives-Hash: ea7d516b354324c344d37d135ee93ca0 On 04/09/2024 01:39, Dale wrote: > I've seen that before too.  I'm hoping not.  I may shutdown my rig, > remove and reinstall the memory and then test it for a bit.  May be a > bad connection.  It has worked well for the past couple months tho. > Still, it is possible to either be a bad connection or just going bad. I've had *MOST* of my self-built systems force me to remove and replace the ram several times before the system was happy. And when a shop "fixed" my computer for me (replacing a mobo that wasn't broken - I told them I thought it needed a bios upgrade and I was right!) they also messed up the ram. Memory is supposed to go in in matched pairs. So what do they do? One stick in each pair of slots - the thing ran like a sloth on tranquillisers! As soon as I realised what they'd done and put both sticks in the same pair, it was MUCH faster. Cheers, Wol