Re: [gentoo-user] Migrating existing Gentoo to binpkg

[byte.size226@simplelogin.com]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1559 bytes --]

On 18/11/2024 09:21, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
>>                                             I also added
>> "--usepkg-exclude 'sys-kernel/gentoo-sources virtual/*" to
>> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, as was recommended by one of the guides anyway :)
> 
> Hm, I can't see any logic in Gentoo developers wasting electrons and key
> strokes to provide at least  one "sys-kernel/gentoo-sources"  and a ple-
> thora of  "virtual/*" packages  on the binhost  and then advising to ex-
> clude them from being used.  Which guide recommended that?
> 

The in-depth "Binary package guide" [1], section 3.7 "Additional client 
settings".

I guess I misspoke by referring to it as "recommendation" but the 
example given, which excludes "sys-kernel/gentoo-sources", can be seen 
as de facto recommendation as it is quite sound.

It makes sense as the "sys-kernel/gentoo-sources" package does not have 
a "binary" package in the sense of a running kernel, which is provided 
by "sys-kernel/gentoo-kerne
l-bin".

Emerging gentoo-source simply shows it as an "[ebuild]" which is what I 
would expect for a package that is supposed to only contain source code. 
Meanwhile, gentoo-kernel-bin is correctly being pulled from the binhost 
as "[binary]".

As for "virtual/", well they don't really contain anything so there's no 
binary to provide. I'm not sure if there's anything "[binary]" on the 
binhost for them as I would struggle to see what that would be other 
than a label for a given... version/revision?

Regards,
Victor

[1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Binary_package_guide

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]