From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7E82158083 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 10:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25D20E29E9; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 10:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.cherry.relay.mailchannels.net (silver.cherry.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.223.166]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC199E29E2 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 10:38:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: thundermail|x-authsender|confabulate@kintzios.com Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00E22C1A98 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 10:38:41 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1725705521; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QttGV6D5XaQsJ09iatjxTQ4S13ryUlgckzxzHsECFdYLZmmZSf72X1vyOstG6ctDZKikRe du3vn8EYhXdGOna+HLNqbq6TIU4IEHfhkIVesQEcjDRdmh7nToNSIjzcEI0QddJQ+iTXtN BNClSxqVo9q5qm6049dcIPUWCYklvtk48sRYAOtFd/A3nxMx6Gy+Jl3IwjSnp70LV7UF8W yWcM301KPakynwu81cmYckswaBN04YlhpmC3Nphg6YrSCgdkoHkqcyw36SQy98UBteYv6G 4qkSGYgzabZEEWdgxjXV4+AzR0i5312N9gMOwdpRJ7G87vtA6Wb1y66D715sig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1725705521; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=ZRW4Ti81378JDoqE6PEfMLDTl22ic4Ye30+MOhs436I=; b=qOv1/uf1+oI+aTl0T9b13LHObYI5ekA4p4VIFwuWqQ73q7SfQpbVi6+Roh94fvfWLw1Tgp qXNUvqIXxLBkdRgQoJqgtG3Hl+xPHRTxbIEyCUssweEkc/jN8+URdFQMLfSc7YGMxevnHs 94gv3dBt2YanycfFhCsp9PyHjL4dPe+2oMbwonONZTDmdFakhkFVjzzZijVHYaB5koRhrW nvuJQXTyAJgqt646f9Gkj/8PG0k8uzEDk+4+Ds1+iJhU3i1Bxlg+9kMpA6PCYQUqUw6o8z g1Rx0QfZiJK3UdiEsq4cvAIf4nXaGRQy+Slv5k5RbLaGYGdfVV4eLZBaPokajA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-77766c4bb8-t2tjj; auth=pass smtp.auth=thundermail smtp.mailfrom=confabulate@kintzios.com X-Sender-Id: thundermail|x-authsender|confabulate@kintzios.com X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: thundermail|x-authsender|confabulate@kintzios.com X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: thundermail X-Macabre-Wipe: 3477adfb2cf26989_1725705521681_3457200521 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1725705521681:4181548930 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1725705521681 Received: from mailclean11.thundermail.uk (mailclean11.thundermail.uk [149.255.60.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.96.73.138 (trex/7.0.2); Sat, 07 Sep 2024 10:38:41 +0000 Received: from cloud238.thundercloud.uk (cloud238.thundercloud.uk [149.255.62.116]) by mailclean11.thundermail.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 603A31E0004 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 11:38:39 +0100 (BST) Authentication-Results: cloud238.thundercloud.uk; spf=pass (sender IP is 217.169.3.230) smtp.mailfrom=confabulate@kintzios.com smtp.helo=rogueboard.localnet Received-SPF: pass (cloud238.thundercloud.uk: connection is authenticated) From: Michael To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE Frameworks 6 window management Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 11:38:38 +0100 Message-ID: <22417340.EfDdHjke4D@rogueboard> In-Reply-To: References: <1920940.CQOukoFCf9@rogueboard> <12513755.O9o76ZdvQC@rogueboard> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7709623.EvYhyI6sBW"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-PPP-Message-ID: <172570551885.3372222.4161431097608789701@cloud238.thundercloud.uk> X-PPP-Vhost: kintzios.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 603A31E0004 X-Rspamd-Server: mailclean11 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.61 / 999.00]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+mx]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34931, ipnet:149.255.60.0/22, country:GB]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-0.989]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[kintzios.com,none]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[confabulate@kintzios.com] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Archives-Salt: 3ea5673a-7328-4917-a035-e329b20ff9b4 X-Archives-Hash: 6e4bcf7d2ae628ed6b1ffb0857ee0bbe --nextPart7709623.EvYhyI6sBW Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Michael To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: confabulate@kintzios.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE Frameworks 6 window management Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 11:38:38 +0100 Message-ID: <22417340.EfDdHjke4D@rogueboard> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Friday 6 September 2024 20:37:59 BST Jack wrote: > On 2024.09.06 11:12, Michael wrote: > > [snip ....] > > > The second problem I started this thread with, related to the Kmail > > composer window inheriting the main Kmail window size and vice versa, > > seems to occur because both windows are identified having the same > > "kmail org.kde.kmail2" named Class. I played around with various > > properties, like window type and what not, but I have not been able > > to add a separate window size for the composer alone without > > affecting the main Kmail window. If anyone comes up with a working > > solution please chime in! > > I haven't been following very closely, but it sound like one approach > would be to have one of the windows use a different name Class. Might > it be worth raising as an issue for kmail itself? I understood the Window Class of an application is hard coded, all a user like me can do is select it. I can't claim to understand this correctly, or furthermore understand how the X11 properties transpose over to a Wayland desktop: https://www.x.org/releases/current/doc/xorg-docs/icccm/ icccm.html#WM_CLASS_Property Either way, the good news is others have been annoyed similarly by this behaviour and raised a bug report. It seems to be a regression bug: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484327 --nextPart7709623.EvYhyI6sBW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEXqhvaVh2ERicA8Ceseqq9sKVZxkFAmbcLS4ACgkQseqq9sKV ZxmGVhAArZYzqoaF1Uk2tsa73ODDmSkS9xX0VqMdObo9dch4iSGmzEybMYvM53uf vwHOqfDgxlSGtdbnVEebWo27v7lhecFAghi0+Zh5S7I6Ctsd1ihBfAxn+jXvyE8r ywE6fBB2wGrR64XH06VVXpBZUsJcbyoq0g7Rs2wLwloywHDAW5fHpaQGIjcuHzn0 /mR2AE58NNbm1FFnOa7uFBBsOZSKBUx6fSkjM6SQBntmfoa+l8jYXguMy2rJ3/wk octwedIg7BYLJAvxSTkiry9Md7GA3s5rcFWVEpHPwC72Wxfg43F5KTRAL4yGHPy4 HijnB8XS+NfbQX4bErN2VDn9h+AhiiARUds2uIihQCwkVMTkqgqEbas46UztfscV PzNo6qoypxGy6aTR3/di34HsRxFNJnWQ/aTzuSo9pniYQwhCe3xExMuy9/0DMnQb pqv55YXAsikS/SQCY07mIX9SKBPXjOlvR8/5OVh1fVL9aXS/Ot9YZLMxSZqErRyS b3/aqOII4NXcT38CNkBLNVWmCYmvemtD1PYL11RdUuo3yupgmzEY1dvBSB8O3Q6F S5ulSYOvAWRabCmhCo1wdSJGlXt+9GONGl5eKqhxVPP6eKU1w5WPJrVRP21yP6uz eIXwx1qChGFEev99+LNfdx2KYN5pGgBM5nQdKuOmTbLaDmkKEQA= =0ot/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7709623.EvYhyI6sBW--