From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-204893-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C454158042
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 10:42:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B86FDE0A04;
	Sat, 26 Oct 2024 10:42:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smarthost01b.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.21])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FC90E08FC
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 10:42:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=cube.localnet)
	by smarthost01b.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.95)
	(envelope-from <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>)
	id 1t4eFd-007TTk-2r
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org;
	Sat, 26 Oct 2024 10:42:33 +0000
From: Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Why does bind-tools 9.18 depend on bind?
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:42:32 +0100
Message-ID: <2761060.mvXUDI8C0e@cube>
In-Reply-To: <ZxykBJAApZmUycMJ@rog.a21an.org>
References:
 <vfe4l7$uk0$1@ciao.gmane.io> <vfg7s1$17he$1@ciao.gmane.io>
 <ZxykBJAApZmUycMJ@rog.a21an.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.80.10]
Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10
X-Archives-Salt: e4333472-7982-4dd3-9ad1-259cf109fad2
X-Archives-Hash: cf967048144bd8acb514a0d15190d7ac

On Saturday 26 October 2024 09:10:44 BST Eray Aslan wrote:

> fwiw, net-dns/unbound is a good choice for a resolver even if you are
> running in a systemd environment.

Interesting. I run dnsmasq here; would unbound be better, or less good? I've 
had no trouble with dnsmasq - it just does the job.

-- 
Regards,
Peter.