From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5DC158042 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 02:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94179E0894; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 02:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01a.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01a.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 560FFE087D for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 02:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=cube.localnet) by smarthost01a.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1t8VWW-009zzM-Cg for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 02:11:57 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Getting tar to keep going Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 02:11:56 +0000 Message-ID: <2768098.mvXUDI8C0e@cube> In-Reply-To: References: <2962590.e9J7NaK4W3@cube> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-smarthost01a-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 63f7318c-8590-419d-a55a-a11955615b07 X-Archives-Hash: 6e6e008848b5c8a6eb107810385f8e8e On Wednesday 6 November 2024 00:08:12 GMT Eli Schwartz wrote: > But my reply was really intended for Peter. I don't quite understand > what Peter read (when saying "the Network Manager man page says to > chattr") to overlook the fact that the manpage is fairly clear in the > only place it talks about chattr, that chattr is not your only option. I didn't just make it up. I did actually read it; I was sure it was in the man page, but it seems I was mistaken. Back to the drawing-board then, but with a better idea of what to do. Thanks all for dragging me back to reality. ;) -- Regards, Peter.