From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E733158046 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6457EE29BB; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01a.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01a.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14079E29AC for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=cube.localnet) by smarthost01a.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1szDCw-00GqNc-Ay for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:49:18 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage improved Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:49:18 +0100 Message-ID: <4617000.LvFx2qVVIh@cube> In-Reply-To: <3315741.aeNJFYEL58@cube> References: <3315741.aeNJFYEL58@cube> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-smarthost01a-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 01c9b3f7-984d-4768-8d51-c4b30d1793c2 X-Archives-Hash: 3abbb50f4372fbb59f134c0cb7d04d7f On Saturday 14 September 2024 13:05:26 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > Just one little fly in the ointment: the status string became too long to > show properly. Perhaps shorter phrases could be used, or numbers limited to > two digits, or the 80-character line limit exceeded while running in an > x-term. And indeed the line limit has been relaxed: it uses the full 90 characters of my Konsoles. > Anyway, well done the team! -- Regards, Peter.