From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 069D9158083 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86ECBE2A79; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01a.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01a.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69137E2A6F for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=cube.localnet) by smarthost01a.ixn.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1slsON-0062Bt-94 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:57:59 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Package compile failures with "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault". Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 16:57:59 +0100 Message-ID: <5820683.DvuYhMxLoT@cube> In-Reply-To: <1a8ca858-b9c0-793a-177a-374114545388@gmail.com> References: <8c26be16-d033-ea3f-06e1-a9ce84cbbafb@gmail.com> <1a8ca858-b9c0-793a-177a-374114545388@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-smarthost01a-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 8ab3ea4d-d025-4474-9e57-93dcc8b3547a X-Archives-Hash: fda048163bce17bca605db7d0c736b54 On Wednesday 4 September 2024 12:21:19 BST Dale wrote: > I wasn't planning to go to 128GBs yet but guess I am now. I considered doubling up to 128GB a few months ago, but the technical help people at Armari (the workstation builder) told me that I'd need to jump through a few hoops. Not only would the chips need to have been selected for that purpose, but I'd have to do a fair amount of BIOS tuning while running performance tests. I decided not to push my luck. -- Regards, Peter.