From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-204968-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6C23158042
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu,  7 Nov 2024 00:34:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CA05E0D2B;
	Thu,  7 Nov 2024 00:34:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:1e9::8849])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0338BE0CED
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  7 Nov 2024 00:34:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Contact-TNet-Consulting-Abuse-for-assistance
	by tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id 4A70Y1Ko015832
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 18:34:02 -0600
Message-ID: <59fae81f-2ec0-4b1c-9317-e0c76f11085e@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 18:34:01 -0600
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Shared distfiles directory between different
 virtual machines
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <2a1e2126-0e31-4ec5-b1ac-ae6532a83c2a@paraboletancza.org>
 <bab1daaa-3bae-e500-5521-9a2d52993f6a@applied-asynchrony.com>
 <3b23ce99-ad20-4131-be2a-47df87708e2c@paraboletancza.org>
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@gentoo.tnetconsulting.net>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <3b23ce99-ad20-4131-be2a-47df87708e2c@paraboletancza.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: e976599e-6f11-4517-9325-e610b502e773
X-Archives-Hash: c667f2af06afb6e20cbb16d939227651

On 11/6/24 11:39, whiteman808 wrote:
> What in case when two lock files are being created at the same time? How 
> can I prevent in this case emerge fail?

Have you actually experienced this type of failure?

Or are you just thinking about worst case?

I've been sharing distfiles between multiple systems over NFS for years 
and not had a problem.  Granted, usually the systems aren't emerging at 
the same time.



-- 
Grant. . . .