From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CAE2158046 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 134D3E07EC; Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6C1CE07B3 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5c96936065dso1248597a12.3 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:21:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1728843666; x=1729448466; darn=lists.gentoo.org; h=subject:to:date:from:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=nE7TCK9LPYn/ujk77Fxb1yh4Mm0Ffh7a5/vtmKGtbM0=; b=N2RTkVvZLq6rXKXNueLJ0ddNbRoIeP+5wvbTWaBxJF3ZxT2MXggtPDBtlA1+UCKdIf /9ugau38GbC8As5aMjsg4wavCwFMrArzpOSFOQACy8ZMdsrSPFozGqVyM0cGSOg2Q6XW vp+2ShEHNhOjJBIS3xQQs6rixDwIUax78zU/KpduWThfLxb3pbNlnxnV2/qowomlANIK TARAC8l8CU5zThoUPEFX2x3gveab6hqxdfiAQ2ZbIBJHFrBUxDYg1jYfuLOEQbUptWIx TsP4hmypK36YjgjXUF6uVM1F8KjjtobmXlDYAKTyZsdfQBuSeufpHRvsFwsrzMnyX6N3 3qvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728843666; x=1729448466; h=subject:to:date:from:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nE7TCK9LPYn/ujk77Fxb1yh4Mm0Ffh7a5/vtmKGtbM0=; b=jWqJYU6DJ0zfNEeobAraoWgSNrU1+TPkBU4UJ6frBf8/hGM1P5P6heK9YDgU7qsbgi E3vjQl/kWdJNALBvrAUyEHP5y8X68pxgkaew6OPgU6AXOXHtnZYlE5Z8L/MvmG1pyJYj Nbp6jSqBdYjsgdBwT8QcFnEOdCdNNt1a6iuR1qN8rigdqjvKNklMqljt6kJrgdcubckp iCKybTjXneTR8Sjb3g3CoDdneDyGL2bw874eaJ7rE+ybsr+SYGEgtM3DNPEtxCfb+EH8 gsbk7uF3rWWrFrXJHIECy2LcVNBFvEacfhCL7k3Z6Dgz8zlpI2/olW4Sje+XkNAcsAaB W2Hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyt8drPjd8rIGPvJSt7JHORajKIqrf//cxOl6UvdJvzXu/CJz+E ag690njE0tGztYLiZlIraEBxkIlfdtB7tS/d4iM78H6g9rAdbR6IzhjXYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFVyU3vVQWHGhRO9DP+Jih1ErfVOwxQokBjpdIoapmMSr7B42LqlXKglVTWWoCMr7t7ioOmQw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2344:b0:5c9:6623:a112 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5c96623aa24mr4419778a12.29.1728843666297; Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tux (p200300df07050742dc4ce8531a475793.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:df:705:742:dc4c:e853:1a47:5793]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5c9370d22f3sm4048591a12.20.2024.10.13.11.21.04 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <670c0f92.050a0220.2ccf02.efbd@mx.google.com> From: Dr Rainer Woitok X-Google-Original-From: Dr Rainer Woitok Received: by tux (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:21:04 +0200 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:21:04 +0200 To: Gentoo-User@Lists.Gentoo.Org Subject: [gentoo-user] "eix" and predicate "{isbinary}" Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply X-Archives-Salt: 47e31149-19d7-4cdf-a725-863193b80d2a X-Archives-Hash: b7a5537b0cf295a8b2cbc8c9f1b84dff Greetings, are there any "eix" gurus out there? I want to check whether or not some installed package was installed from a binary or an ebuild. However, according to "man eix" predicate "{is- binary}" "returns 1 or empty depending on whether there is a correspond- ing *.tbz2, *gpkg.tar, or *.xpak file for the version". This is not ex- actly what I need, because an existing binary package for the same ver- sion does not guarantee that the package was really installed from that binary: if the USE flags don't match, the package will nevertheless be installed from the ebuild. So, is there a way to persuade "eix" to reveal this information? Or is there any other command I could use? Any hints welcome :-) Sincerely, Rainer