From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA1F158042 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 09:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09B1FE0A68; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 09:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7F88E0A02 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 09:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-37d5689eea8so1896915f8f.1 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 02:40:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1729935621; x=1730540421; darn=lists.gentoo.org; h=references:subject:in-reply-to:to:date:from:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cWnmI0fz0DK987aGznCJNuaacnJLtIIXzX8OaZQE5VQ=; b=a8skjeSGy2SoZ+SCp4mibFYuC92KQwnUgfIFZoR7NnIfOZkUvQOXvRWK0gefIvhcl5 boyAYyoAKJ9yR4G1NMaKovWtDaWvO3LeBbCHHIW2YZy4Guz0iNGLhDkPkmZb0AXzIKXT 7OnGleHeXdF/CCtfienuHwnyQYS7uraQ0bPVcyIHKDWEbSETtif3KiSkUPi7U+T1oiUe 9VPmiJ3Ne2XwTB4AD4Y/Me+uRJzu9PQsIBh8G+IivoL+GB0ywOn0tOeclBKaokfMVLiq j7nsW4zrNU3h73cS4c5zUzDa2r1ZSv5MWSj5H/M5i8G0xGLstpwwlaezRbfqDHfGH5WS 1Eig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729935621; x=1730540421; h=references:subject:in-reply-to:to:date:from:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cWnmI0fz0DK987aGznCJNuaacnJLtIIXzX8OaZQE5VQ=; b=gbbKRgVTW4Kk0RWKuvFLHrJAPpp+njjorD2/ihocjBMjpzYzVnRKVhKO6PVfiZ551n y82yNZes1KVRLiiZQtyLChoHowfLrmj2xyuF4pZY6H7NwDSgsOt7s4Ne9PCWU3gvctXG B7iLDUCPUnd1vBlo0J5HXwSHTyXXQXloiJbwlPJHOLS0Zk7t3wfD0Fwany5eFn5L1wdf 96wOkto7PVMWOXlqdN6HJrBxm0xp1curBS8vKvUyb+B6LE+FrOAYvkEdBQ2JxAho1Kyq TLIiwJsnEe2wyhXjwCmlSE+XhA0kWuMeIy1DX94yBFA4YTFEQ53E7oUvXHOZttEFMNHp CRtA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzsfJybXbRcd+K0cwK5btuZy5Ig6p9WM2mOvZzeJcqGWAll/2tu V3iS/UF6vJ9IP9rlZQAgw7CPpDv0qEILoACFQVNtQbGJnazwsWclflZzYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFVoFH03zlmrTrKJVVfh18p2drejxphL8DBtpchEAueaPrynEEgBJSc6TKC/GcRk3BeMCgNyw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e6c4:0:b0:374:c4e2:3ca7 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-380610f81cdmr1579010f8f.5.1729935621280; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 02:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tux (p200300df0705073bf421ebbd5693c6ad.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:df:705:73b:f421:ebbd:5693:c6ad]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38058b3af02sm3840787f8f.25.2024.10.26.02.40.19 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 26 Oct 2024 02:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <671cb905.5d0a0220.245097.d74f@mx.google.com> From: Dr Rainer Woitok X-Google-Original-From: Dr Rainer Woitok Received: by tux (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:40:18 +0200 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:40:18 +0200 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <2acf0931-8d75-4e2d-99f2-75a8f8fcd94e@gentoo.org> (message from Matt Jolly on Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:35:00 +1000) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why does bind-tools 9.18 depend on bind? References: <2acf0931-8d75-4e2d-99f2-75a8f8fcd94e@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply X-Archives-Salt: b34ba66c-04cc-48a1-9dd6-2ce6e2bb94ec X-Archives-Hash: 447829c67a4abc216dc0d124c58de146 Matt and others, On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:35:00 +1000 Matt Jolly wrote: > ... > On 25/10/24 04:45, Grant Edwards wrote: > > ... > > What's so special about bind-tools 9.18 that it has to have bind > > installed? > > The commit that added 9.18.0[1] gives some context: > > >This is just a proxy for net-dns/bind. Splitting the ebuilds is *way* too > >fragile and gains nothing because the same software gets built again > anyway, > >just thrown away at the end. Doesn't that mean that best practice would be to just ditch "net-dns/ bind-tools" and solely install "net-dns/bind" instead? At least up to now the latter _also_ provides "nslookup" and "dig". Sincerely, Rainer